
Home  About  Table of Contents  Advanced Search  Copyright  Feedback  Privacy 


Unless otherwise stated this page contains Version 1.0 content (Read more about versions) 2.1.3 The measurement of high pressuresThe Practical Pressure Scale at high pressures For pressure measurements from atmospheric pressure up to 2.6 GPa primary standard pressure balances (also called piston gauges or dead weight testers) of different types are used. The typical measurement uncertainties of these balances^{1} (at the 1σ level) are ± 10 ppm at 100 MPa, ± 100 ppm at 1 GPa and ± 1000 ppm at 2.6 GPa, increasing to some % at 10 GPa when pistoncylinder systems are used. Beyond the range conveniently attainable by primary standards, there are several practical techniques for the measurement of pressure which are now recognized internationally: fixed points (phase transitions), equations of state and phenomena such as the ruby fluorescence shift. Some international conferences have issued recommendations on a practical pressure scale. At a symposium at the US National Bureau of Standards^{2} N.B.S. (now National Institute of Standards and Technology N.I.S.T.), held in 1968, agreement was reached on the pressure values associated with certain phase transitions up to 10 GPa. A Task Group, appointed under the auspices of the International Association for the Advancement of High Pressure Science and Technology (AIRAPT) at its 6th Conference (Boulder, Colorado, 1977), is charged with making recommendations for an International Practical Pressure Scale; the first such recommendations were made at the 8th AIRAPT Conference (Uppsala, Sweden, 1981)^{3} and the second at the 10th AIRAPT Conference (Amsterdam, Holland, 1985).^{4} Different review papers^{1,5,6} and books^{7,8} have treated in detail the realization of the high pressure scale. As it is difficult to use primary standards for pressure measurements above 2 GPa, ‘reference points’ based on the phase transitions of pure substances are used. The phase transitions are frequently traceable to the primary pressure measurements and can be used as calibrants in the appropriate pressure ranges and are often associated with temperature fixed points. Basic group of reference pressures associated with phase transition of pure substances (Means of identification of transition: electrical resistance or volume change)
* Values recommended at the NBS
symposium, from reference 2. The values given in the table represent the best
estimate of the true transition pressure; the uncertainty associated with each
value represents an estimate of how close the true transition pressure lies to
the value given. It must be stressed that the degree of reproducibility of a
transition pressure will depend on the experimental conditions and the method
of realization of the transition. For detailed discussions of these topics see
the review by Decker et al.,^{5} the review by
Holzapfel,^{6} Chapter 3, by Bean, of reference 7 and Chapter 6 by
Sherman and Stadtmuller of reference 8. Mercury solid–liquid equilibrium at other temperatures It has been recommended^{3,4} that the best representation of the mercury melting curve up to 1.2 GPa is a thirdorder polynomial based on the work of Molinar et al.^{9} The equation, referenced to the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS90), is^{10}: p = 1.932 845 10^{−2}d + 1.833 3 10^{−6}d^{ 2} + 5.979 1 10^{−8} d ^{3} GPa where d = T – 234.3156, and T is the temperature in kelvin referred to the ITS90 Temperature Scale. The residual standard deviation of
this polynomial equation is 0.059 MPa and the estimated uncertainty of the
mercury melting curve at the pressure of 1.2 GPa is ± 0.39 MPa.
Extrapolation of the polynomial above 1.2 GPa is not recommended. Additional reference pressures associated with phase transitions These phase transitions have also been
recommended,^{4} but they were calibrated as to pressure without the
use of primary standards and frequently without a complete evaluation of the
uncertainties; therefore such values should be used with caution and only when
no other techniques are available.
^{†} Derived from V. E.
Bean et al., reference 4. Pressure scale as defined by the equation of state of sodium chloride The AIRAPT Task Group reports of 1981^{3} and of 1985^{4} recommended that the Decker equationofstate data for sodium chloride^{11} be used as the practical reference standard in the pressure range below its phase transition to the CsCl structure (i.e. 29.6 GPa as originally determined by Decker’s equation,^{11} now under revision). Calculated pressures (rising values) versus compression for NaCl at 25ºC
The above table is based on that given by Decker in reference 5. These data are derived from more extensive input data than those previously published in reference 11 and cover a greater pressure range. Data for other temperatures, namely 0°, 100°, 200°, 300°, 500° and 800 °C, may be found in reference 11. Pressure p = f (t, Δa/a_{0}) can also be computed by means of a polynomial representation of the Decker equation of state.^{12} The NaCl equation of state is believed to represent the true pressure with an uncertainty of ± 1.1% up to 5 GPa, ± 1.7% up to 10 GPa and ± 2.4% up to 20 GPa. A more recent and precise redetermination of the NaCl equation of state^{13} up to a pressure of 3.2 GPa indicates that Decker’s equation of state overestimates pressure at 3.2 GPa by about 1.6%. At higher pressures, Ruoff et al.^{14} found, on the basis of shock data and Clapeyron thermodynamic data, that the NaCl phase transition at room temperature is 25.7 GPa, a value lower by 14.5% than the value (29.6 GPa) obtained with the use of Decker’s equation of state. It is therefore advisable to use Decker’s equation of state, a very important and useful equation, with some caution, until a complete verification of its limits of accuracy and also until more accurate and reliable equations of state of other substances, e.g. Cu, Ag, Au and particularly Pt, are available. Pressure measurement using the ruby fluorescence shift The shift in the wavelength of the R_{1}
fluorescence line of ruby is now used extensively as a pressure standard in
diamond anvil cells. The following equations are taken from reference 3 and
reference 6, where Δλ is the wavelength shift in
nanometres: (a) for pressures up to 29 GPa, based on the work of
Piermarini et al.^{15, 16} who used the equation of state of
NaCl as the pressure standard, the following linear relation gives the pressure
versus the wavelength shift of ruby:
where B = 5 for the nonhydrostatic case and
B = 7.665 for the quasihydrostatic measurements. Current developments in luminescence gauges Other materials have recently been tested that exhibit
more sensitivity to the luminescence effect than ruby, with the use, for
example, of the sharpline transition of Sm^{2+} in
SrB_{4}O_{7} (or BaFCl and SrFCl)^{19} and of Sm:
YAG.^{20} Pressure dependence of melting temperatures of some pure metals in the range 0–20 GPa (Derived from Akella and Kennedy^{21})
References
G.F.Molinar 
Home  About  Table of Contents  Advanced Search  Copyright  Feedback  Privacy  ^ Top of Page ^ 

This site is hosted by the National Physical Laboratory 
